http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_12382105
China, eh? That's a very interesting move by Obama. Definitely not something I was expecting; were there any rumors running about in Utah Democratic circles? It does make the 2012 race more interesting by potentially removing him from it. At the same time, it'll burnish Jon's foreign policy credentials for a possible run at the Presidency in 2016.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
"The Liberal Soul Shall Be Made Fat"
Email Address
mormonleft at gmail dot com
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(104)
-
▼
May
(12)
- Sotomayor and Judicial Activism
- Term Limits
- The Haves and the Have Nots
- Congrats to Jon
- A National Sales Tax
- On Manny and Steroids and Human Nature
- The Revolution Will Not Be Authorized
- Greetings from the Republic of California
- Advocacy and Partisanship
- Characteristics of Great Leaders
- Is President Obama a Socialist?
- Utah Loves Obama
-
▼
May
(12)
Posts
Blogs
Blogregate at Mormon Blogs
Mormon Blogosphere
Popular Posts
- Second Greatest Mormon Baseball Player (Pitcher Division)
- Open Thread Discussion
- Glenn Beck: Mormon, Sadly
- The Constitution Hanging By A Thread
- Harmon Killebrew, Greatest Mormon Baseball Player, Dies
- Urban Sprawl and the Utah Lake Bridge
- Health Care and the Budget
- The Law of Consecration and Stewardship
- The Status of Wolves in Utah
- Two More Debt Ceiling Facepalms
3 comments:
So this is a pretty interesting move. It seemed like Huntsman was doing all he could to raise his profile nationally for 2012, then he skips off to China and will likely disappear until he is done. I imagine, then, that he isn't interested in running in 2012, maybe eying 2016 when he doesn't have to go up against Pres. Obama.
It's a pretty great move if he is trying to build some foreign policy experience, even though he has already been an ambassador to Singapore. You could easily argue that China is America's most important rival in the world, so that has to be the absolute biggest ambassadorial plumb. It's interesting that Pres. Obama offered it to a Republican.
Actually I think that Huntsman is the perfect choice for the position. Unlike so many, he doesn't view China as a threat, but as the greatest potential ally. China needs us, and we need China. I think that both Obama's and Huntsman's perception of the great "middle country" are the same.
One interesting political storm that could arise from all of this is Huntsman's loyalty to, and affection for Taiwan (where he served a mission for the LDS church).
The simple fact that he speaks Mandarin (it's pretty good) will break down major ideological and cultural barriers. The Chinese are more likely to trust someone that speaks their language, both figuratively and literally. At least that has been my experience.
I like the bit at the end of the article about Kissinger carrying Huntsman's bags. Kissinger looms large in the history U.S.-Chinese relations; that'd make for an interesting passing-of-the-torch metaphor. I'm somewhat familiar with Kissinger's work through his influence on U.S. policy in Africa and reading here and there about his role in trying to keep China out of the USSR's orbit.
I'm not a huge fan of what he did -- I think he saw the whole situation as a zero-sum game and played to the Chinese and Russians at the expense of the rest of the world. He also had a Cheney-like thirst for consolidating power (I say "Cheney-like" because Cheney really did take it to a whole new level). In so doing he helped set up many of the situations around the world that plague us now. It will be interesting to see how he helps the Obama administration deal with China, and if the Obama administration has the foresight to keep us out of the same kinds of messes that can be traced, in part, back to the Nixon and Ford years.
Post a Comment